Resources

Home
University of Metaphysical Sciences

Church Services
Essays
Discussion Forum
Daily Affirmations
Guided Meditations
About Us
Contact

Metaphysical Community News

What Is Satsang?

"Satsang" is a Sanskrit word meaning "gathering in truth." The Universal Church of Metaphysics offers free video satsangs through the Internet.

Winter Retreats, Satsangs and Workshops

Read more about upcoming retreats with Christine Breese..

Featured Affirmation

Evergreen trees are symbols of immortality and being free from the past and future.


I now remember
the enlightenment I was born with,
knowing myself as
Divinity in the flesh.

What are Affirmations?

Affirmations are words of power that have a healing effect on those who use them. Words truly do have the power to heal, and they can change your life. The Universal Church of Metaphysics invites you to explore the spiritual healing power of affirmations.

Admit That There’s A Problem And That There’s A Solution

(This is an excerpt from a University Of Metaphysical Sciences course at www.umsonline.org, please feel free to visit the school website)

 

Most people believe that something exists between them and the ability to create. This is the byproduct of pop psychology and self-help approaches that love nothing more than to diagnose your problem and then tell you how to fix it. The supposed solution may be therapies, affirmations, positive thinking or heightened emotional zeal. But to be creative…? “No amount of therapy will enable you to play the piano,” says Robert Fritz, in his book Creating (1991).

The issue is to admit that there is a solution to a problem. To many people, that challenge is to recognize and admit that there is a problem in the first place. This is the result of the vast number of areas where the conscious mind unconsciously passes through certain tasks without questioning the validity of either ritual or result. As mentioned earlier, there are distinct advantages and reasons for doing this. However, if one were to begin with an informal look at the activity and results in one’s life, and then ask the question whether or not said results and activities are satisfying, the door for the question is open.

One of the easiest and most universal examples of this is to reflect on the beginnings of any serious, intimate romantic relationship in one’s life, especially when or where it concerns sharing living space. For a brief (though sometimes longer) period of time, almost every mundane ritual that has been established in your life is hit with an illumination of perspective. From how the towels are folded to where the alarm clock is placed (and at what volume) becomes a question open to explanation and discussion.

If we think back to these early days of relationship building, many instances of tension and eruptive emotion emerge as we rebel against analyzing each of our activities. They all seem quite rational and justified…in fact, “beyond” analysis. The logic, in our rationale, simply speaks for itself. However, when establishing a mutual routine, we are often unable to provide a specific rationale that stands any sort of test for being “better” or “more efficient” than our partner’s way. The annoyances add up because we do not want to put this kind of scrutiny on mundane activities…at least not so many and not constantly. Of course, there is always acquiescence, which in some cases is quite acceptable and valid. A true creative would seize the impetus of opportunity to truly question themselves and absorb the self-knowledge contained in the creeping establishment of these simple habits in our lives. The worst choice is to figuratively rip the list in half and say, “I’ll give in on the way the dishes are stacked but not on the way towels are folded.” In this instance, we have neither taken advantage of uncovering self knowledge or exercised creative capacities in ourselves. There is also the fact that we are setting precedents for continual and further separation of ourselves from conscious choices. The rather unexciting nature of this example contains all the perquisites of the way in which creativity is ignored and the way in which thinking must be challenged in order to first perceive and then remedy the problems with which we seek creative solutions.

In the later section on Einstein, the art of finding the right problem and asking the right questions is illustrated further. Following, however, is a short compilation of the further resistances we might find in beginning to attempt creative thinking in regards to specific problem solving events. As explained by Robert Grudin in his book The Grace of Great Things: Creativity and Innovation (1990), we rebel against the “intangible” nature of instinctive leaps, emotional processing and free form associations. Grudin offers the following breakdown of this struggle:

1. The task, while simple when viewed abstractly, becomes an emotional challenge to our sense of control and order of ideas…in a sense, a challenge to our sense of being in control.

2. This challenge produces a loop of irrational, negative feedback that plays upon itself. Doubt, indecision, and distraction cause negative feelings and physiological changes, which in turn cause us to feel bad (emotionally and physically) and then doubt and evade all the more.

3. The loop created by doubt is augmented by conscious or unconscious comparisons (with others, with other situations, etc…) in which we begin to compare ourselves to others negatively.

4. Impulses arise to distractive actions that incorporate the visual (Right Brain-Mode) centers such as cleaning and organizing the desk or office, or doodling on a pad, staring out the window or some such thing. This action is a form of engaging and assuaging the associative thinking components of the brain while boxing them into a linear, ordered activity.

5. The tasks (of #4) produce a certain catharsis to the emotional anxiety, and either release us to continue further or stymie further activity by fooling us into believing that a thing has moved forward or actually been accomplished when what we have actually done is merely relieve the emotional pressure involved with trying to engage creative thinking.

This scenario helps to illustrate that there is no amount of “conscious concentration” through which creativity can be achieved. We can’t will it or force it. Creativity requires that all functions be engaged without holds or bars or censorships or definitions in place. It is truly a “mind/body” experience, drawing upon sensory perceptions as well as the imagery of associative thought. A key, according to Grudin, is to modulate and focus the thinking and the environmental experience so that we create the most conducive, least distractive setting (emotionally and physically).

Improving Focus in a creative environment! To attain better focus, you need to improve your work environment intelligently. Intelligence, better creativity, finding the problem intelligent help can be yours if you’re in trouble or stuck as a writer.