Resources

Home
University of Metaphysical Sciences

Church Services
Essays
Discussion Forum
Daily Affirmations
Guided Meditations
About Us
Contact

Metaphysical Community News

What Is Satsang?

"Satsang" is a Sanskrit word meaning "gathering in truth." The Universal Church of Metaphysics offers free video satsangs through the Internet.

Winter Retreats, Satsangs and Workshops

Read more about upcoming retreats with Christine Breese..

Featured Affirmation

Evergreen trees are symbols of immortality and being free from the past and future.


I now remember
the enlightenment I was born with,
knowing myself as
Divinity in the flesh.

What are Affirmations?

Affirmations are words of power that have a healing effect on those who use them. Words truly do have the power to heal, and they can change your life. The Universal Church of Metaphysics invites you to explore the spiritual healing power of affirmations.

Looking at the Lives of the Masters: Einstein & Da Vinci

(This is an excerpt from a University Of Metaphysical Sciences course at www.umsonline.org, please feel free to visit the school website)

 

Homer, Aristotle, Confucius, Dane, Newton, Milton…most of them did not speak of their own creating as a subject of special interest. Of course, there were exceptions. Da Vinci, for example kept detailed notes and observations about his own creative process and the creative process in general. For the most part, it is not until the early nineteenth century, with the romantics, that we begin to get hints of self-awareness in the creative process. It is not until the twentieth century that an awareness of the creative process becomes a defined self-concern. This can be tied to the general twentieth century discovery of the unconscious mind and the kind of attention that went into the process of creativity, along with every other kind of mental activity.

Because we lack a definitive way of categorizing and quantifying any type of mental activity, let alone that of inspiration and the creative process, it seems prudent to look at two specific and exceptional creatives in detail and as much through their own eyes and words as possible.

Einstein

In his book, How to Think Like Einstein, Scott Thorpe analyzes the creative process through his particular attention on Einstein’s life, words and works. Einstein qualifies as a remarkable, creative individual for several reasons. He was best known for his Theory of Relativity, a formula for which can be recognized by almost 100% of the educated public. We will also look at a bit of his work that is from the very earliest part of his life, pre World War II, when he was still a young man. However, it is his life afterward that is indelibly printed in our memory: the ruffled white hair and thick moustache on a kindly grandfather face. His major contribution already accomplished, he became and remained an icon. Why? Because he was present. His creative outlook was not confined to a field of physics. His was actually a creative outlook on the problems affecting our sense of God and the Universe, specializing solving mathematical problems. This kept him busily engaged by think tanks, universities, presidents and prime ministers who continually sought his view on a wide range of universal problems.

A second reason for Einstein’s continued public focus is that he exhibited almost all of the characteristics of a true creative type: he was compassionate, impassioned, caring, generous, reclusive, full of humor, etc… In short, he was a true individual, a thinker independent of political correctness and convention, an original. An original is always interesting and unpredictable, especially in times of fear experienced through the advent of wars, McCarthyism and so forth.
One of Einstein’s first motifs is that if you can’t solve a problem, it’s probably because you are stuck in the rules. Though he may not have ever stated this, he practiced it. He assiduously avoided “rule-ruts.” Remember the ruts in the road that led to modern track gages for trains? Rules are not always bad, but they’re like railroad tracks. Sometimes, in order to get where we want to go, we need to get off the tracks. The trains just don’t run there.

As an example, we can look at Einstein’s famous theory and its discovery. At the time, Einstein was a kid just out of college. He claimed that most people thought about time and space and learned about it as children, but that his development had been retarded and he hadn’t started thinking about time and space until he was an adult…and by that time he had the tools (the mathematical knowledge) to play with his ideas. Children may ask “why” a certain thing has to be a certain way, or why a certain thing acts a certain way, but they do not have the tools (in this case, mathematical skills) to satisfy their own curiosity. They rely on the verbal assurance of an adult, who may or may not have considered the problem themselves and is most likely just repeating conventional wisdom.
At this point, Einstein was a postal patent officer and did physics in his spare time for fun. E=mc2 is a solution for, or at least a way of looking at, what is actually a very old problem: why light always seems to travel at the same speed relative to any position. (If this doesn’t seem such a big deal, think about cars on a highway. The closer they are to you, the faster they seem to travel). Newton, in discovering and explaining his own ideas hundreds of years earlier, had declared that time was absolute. It did not run faster or slower. It made perfect sense, and it certainly helped his equations to work out. For hundreds of years, this “truth” was accepted. Einstein simply imagined that time could run faster or slower, and that started the whole process.

Through this imagining of a possibility other than what everyone else took for granted, Einstein demonstrated another of his particular flairs and a general characteristic for unlocking creativity: Breaking the Rules. “Rules” can be, as discussed earlier, anything from convention to actual rules governing a particular set of thinking as in, say, economics or marketing. The story of the Gordian Knot is one that appealed to Einstein. During the time of Alexander the Great (before he was, “The Great”) there was a certain legend or prophecy around the Gordian Knot, which was a very complex weave of ropes…sort of like a Rubik’s Cube of rope. It was said that, “He who unties the Gordian Knot shall rule the world.” Many great minds and leaders amused themselves in the attempt, much like the Arthurian legend of the Sword in the Stone, in which every passerby attempted to pull the sword free. When Alexander learned of the Knot, he traveled to the city and studied its complexities for sometime. Then he drew his sword and sliced the ropes, proclaiming himself destined to rule the world. Alexander, like Einstein and other creatives, simply refused to follow a particular set of rules.

As an experiment, gage your reactions to the breaking the rules. There is probably a mixture of “You can’t do that,” to “That’s cheating” or “That’s not fair.” The truth is, in order to creatively succeed, you will need to break rules. In everyday life, we have to: Identify the Rules. We all have them and live by them. See which of those are yours and which you’ve merely adopted or accepted. Then you must see if they’re valid. In Einstein’s case, he decided that Newton’s established rules weren’t valid for him. He began with an assumption, and that assumption was itself a violation of one of Newton’s very constants of physics, the idea that time is linear and unchanging.

The peculiar, admirable and exemplary thing about Einstein that makes him such an example of creativity is that he rarely accepted any rules without testing them. He applied this perspective to almost everything in his life. As he said, “Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one.” He was equally persistent in not accepting “reality” as an established fact.

Once one has determined and examined the rules there are other possibilities. One can violate the rules. In this case, look to the American rebels during Revolutionary war. They violated the established rules of battle. They refused to march on parade or to bring units face to face with the enemy on an open battlefield. Instead, having learned from the Native Americans, they hid behind trees and rocks, dressed in camouflage colors instead of bright uniforms and other equally abhorrent violations of the existing code of ethics. To us today, their behavior makes perfect sense, as it usually does with Einstein and others when the strategy is successful. It seems laughable and ludicrous that anyone would stand still to be shot at during a military campaign. It is, in fact, a complete violation of the primal instinct of self-preservation, which only illustrates further how entrenched and destructive a set of rules can become to a social mindset. The British and other modern powers of the day were outraged over the behavior of the colonists, especially the lack of war manners and etiquette.

Another possibility is to circumvent the rule. That is, go around the rule but change the consequences. If you jump out of an airplane, carry a parachute. When you’re having financial problems, negotiate with the utility company, or find aid that is not necessarily monetary to shore up other needs and free cash flow. Successful entrepreneurs are extremely adept at this, but most people do not consider alternatives (like negotiating) simply because it’s not part of their own rulebook, so to speak.

An interesting note is that Einstein’s theory was almost proven wrong. An eclipse was due to occur and testing was going to be done which would have invalidated Einstein’s theory. The problem wasn’t so much his theory as it was that the (then) current technical abilities would not have been able to prove him correct. However, WWI delayed the experiment several years, which gave him the opportunity to amend a few minor but significant things in the theory. When an eclipse next happened and technology advanced, which set the conditions to test his theory, it was then proven to be correct. In the first instance, the others would have demonstrated only what they were expecting to see, relying on Newton’s “constant” in the very conditions of their experiment. They did not yet have the proper perspective even to be able to “see” the possibility that Einstein had presented.

Along the way, we should simply ignore inconvenient facts. As Thomas Edison said, “Hell, there are no rules—we’re trying to accomplish everything.” One example of this is of Miranda Stuart, who became a doctor when women were barred from studying medicine. She wanted to study medicine, so she simply enrolled as though she were a male. She checked the “M” box, so to speak. She didn’t disguise herself or attempt to mask the fact. She just ignored the rule that said women couldn’t study medicine, and circumvented the rule by marking that she was a man. When she arrived in class everyone just assumed that she should be there because she was there, and when it was investigated, the “Rule” for why women could not study medicine had already been disproved by the fact that she already was studying medicine.

“It’s not that I’m smart, it’s just that I stay with the problems longer,” said Einstein. One of Einstein’s major focuses in his work and his thinking about the world was that we have to find the right problem. Unless we can correctly identify the problem, we are incapable of asking the right questions that will lead us to a solution. In regards to his own work, Einstein noted that they [Science] had always asked, “How can nature appear to act that way when we know that it can’t?” His question was, “What would nature be like if it did act the way we are observing it to act.” In a way, we all tend to look at an anomaly and try to pull it into line with our other thinking, when in fact, it is the anomaly itself that illustrates something wrong with the sum of our previous thinking. Just as Columbus could see an anomaly in the water current charts and maps and assumed that some piece was missing out of the puzzle, so too should we ask the question from that standpoint. The problem isn’t the anomaly. The anomaly exists. The problem is the rest of the thinking that cannot account for the anomaly.

 “Impossible only means you haven’t found the solution yet.” At one point everyone knew that the world was flat; that thunder and lighting were the gods at play or battle; that the sun moved around the earth; that time was constant. It comes down to a mindset of opening yourself to any and all possibilities and looking at obstacles as an adventure instead of a problem. This may seem simplistic, and easier said then done, especially when one is confronting a whole potato patch full of problems in life. However, as a creative thinker, we can live an adventure and adopt, as Einstein did, a “James Bond 007” solution to problem solving. Einstein was willing to make very big mistakes, and he did quite often. Ego will defeat you if you can’t take the defeat as learning, and learn from it. “In order to be an immaculate member of a flock of sheep, one must above all be a sheep oneself.” (Einstein)